Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban is the series’
most confident and comfortable translation from printed page to big screen,
showcasing the most competent and relaxed directing of the big screen saga.
Even after the sequence has concluded, the third film is likely the most
visually appealing. The movie's set design is outstanding. Many of the themes
had been hinted at in the prior two films, but Prisoner of Azkaban provides the
most definite view on what a Harry Potter picture should look like. There's a
weird mix of current CGI techniques and vintage aesthetic embellishments at
work here.
I believe the movie tries its best to reflect the distinct
Britishness of all this magic herein. Despite the actors and locale, there's
something distinctly British about the whole thing, whether it's the almost
Python-sequel humour of an inflated aunt or the whole concept of the
"night bus." Even if the film is still relatively bright and happy,
one can sense the evil creeping into the series. There is a slew of spooky and
eerie structures at work here, such as the creepy playground where Harry stands
for the bus. It never tries to overpower the picture, but it is undeniably
present.
There's a lot of ingenuity on display here, as well as an
intentional shift away from pseudo-realism and toward a more deliberately
stylized manner. Consider the few moments that pass between the instant Harry
senses he's been grasped and the moment he's whirled around the enormous
swinging tree. Indeed, I believe that Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
is a film that excels more in the minor details than in the big ones. It nearly
functions more as a compilation of events and concepts than as a cohesive
narrative.
You'll note that I'm not specifically discussing the screenplay. This is due to the fact that this instalment is quite light on the ground. Despite the fact that the narrative is rather minor, the film lasts for over two hours. That said, I admire how the tale successfully takes a break from the "Voldemort" mega-plot that runs throughout the series. As a result, the plot allows for a more intimate emphasis on Harry himself, with a very clear narrative journey in line and several revelations about his own background to be discovered.
But at the other side, the film uses its relatively long
running time to give its actors chance to expand and mature. David Thewlis, who
plays Professor Lupin and teaches Defense Against the Dark Arts, is one of the
series' better cast performers. The enigma surrounding the guy is quite simple,
but I appreciate how well-structured the film is. And, to be fair, given the
film's structural flaws, it contains some touching dramatic moments. There's a
great scene near the end of the film, for example, where Harry is almost sure
that his father is still living.
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban isn't the finest
in the franchise, but it's one of the better ones, and maybe the nicest and
performed. It's clever and a touch humorous, with some simply stunning set
design.

No comments:
Post a Comment